Anderson et at. Although the common law of torts is in many ways wider than the modern European law of delict, in practice it hides a tendency to deal with tort problems under different headings of the law, such as contract, property, inheritance, or even crimes. . The study discussed the concept of tort liability as regards to education with a definite focus on its implication for teachers. To invite the Connecticut Supreme Court to say otherwise can only create mischief. One who keeps wild animals (lions, tigers, bears, etc.) Person 1. Similarly it involves giving people freedom to choose whether they would rather engage in the activity and pay the costs of doing so, including accident costs, or, given the accident costs, engage in safer activities that might otherwise have seemed less desirable. Duty, it turns out was pretty much the, The District Court got all of this exactly right, ruling that, In its principal brief to the Second Circuit, Hotchkiss quoted the Connecticut Supreme Court in, The easiest way to see what is wrong with the defendants argument is to look at the structure and the facts of, Prior to the 1970s, courts overwhelmingly dismissed negligence claims like Monks. Examples of intentional torts include: Assault: In tort law, assault means that someone threatened or attempted to harm another person, but did not actually touch them. By: SCJ on October 9th, 2016 at 12:01 pm. In Monk, the Supreme Court of Connecticut offered the above-quoted policy factors as reasons to be cautious about holding establishments to a duty to protect patrons against not only criminals, but also individuals who happen to choose their parking lots as the locus in which to carry out their vendettas. Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login). Types of items that can fall under this sort of case can include medical devices, medications, food, consumer goods, vehicles, and more. : In tort law, assault means that someone threatened or attempted to harm another person, but did not actually touch them. This happens when the defendant acts outrageously and causes emotional distress. B, "Could I borrow your riding lawnmower to cut my grass this weekend?" B replies, "Sure, just bring it back by next weekend." B gives A the key to the mower, whereupon A drives it to A's garage. The concern is not merely that todays courts will be use the flexibility of duty-as-pure-policy to make easy cases difficult, or to provide a means of backdoor tort reform, although both of these are indeed troubling aspects of Munn. This second edition contains updated information and new case studies, offering guidance for safer programs and management of risk while reinforcing sound educational practices. In short, there is no question about where Connecticut law stands on the question of whether mere participation in a risky activity, with some awareness of the risk, is sufficient to render the imposition of that risk reasonable as a matter of law. And, in cases of intentional injuries inflicted at school, the school and/or school district may also be liable for their negligence in allowing the injury to happen. The question of whether the duty element is satisfied is a question, in the first instance, of whether the plaintiff was situated in relation to the defendant such thatunder a fair reading of relevant precedentsthe defendant really was obligated to be vigilant of the relevant aspects of the plaintiffs well being. Product liability. A jury awarded them $10 million in economic damages and $31.5 million in noneconomic damages. This can be in the form of physical harm as well as emotional distress. What are Examples of Intentional Torts? Old law school exams given at St. Mary's University School of Law. In its principal brief to the Second Circuit, Hotchkiss quoted the Connecticut Supreme Court in Monk v. Temple George Assoc., LLC, 869 A.2d 179 (Conn. 2005): Connecticut courts do not impose a duty if doing so would be inconsistent with public policy, which is determined by weighing four factors: (1) the normal expectations of the participants in the activity under review; (2) the public policy of encouraging participation in the activity, while weighing the safety of the participants; (3) the avoidance of increased litigation; and (4) the decisions of other jurisdictions. (citation omitted). But if the principal reads a report about that same incident, she can't talk about it publicly. Proximate cause was found in the 1927 case of Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad. , causing an accident by failing to obey traffic rules); and strict liability torts ( e.g., liability for making and selling defective products - s ee Products Liability ). But even where tort law plays a major compensatory rolefor example, in the most serious cases of personal injuryit does not function with great efficiency. When one asks if Hotchkiss had a duty to warn of tick-borne encephalitis, one is actually straddling two questions: (i) whether Hotchkisss duty of care to its students includes a duty to protect them against dangers associated with school trips; (ii) whether, assuming there is such a duty, tick-borne encephalitis is so unlikely that the failure to take steps that would protect against it does not count as a breach of that duty. Liebeck v. McDonald's. Stella Liebeck, the 79-year-old woman who was severely burned by McDonald's coffee that she spilled in her lap in 1992, was unfairly held up as an example of frivolous litigation in the public eye. Tort law cannot do that but both tort and crimes can invoke financial penalties, and substantial ones at that. Though tort lawyers rightly regard tort as the compensation system that caters best to the particular victim on the basis of the pre-accident situation and prognosis of his future, it nonetheless remains expensive, capricious, and dilatory. There is a deep irony at work here. Typical of this approach is the Napoleonic Code of 1804, which became a model for most Romanistic legal systems, including those of Italy and Spain and their derivatives, mainly in Central and South America. Obviously, it's a lot easier to read a well-written case brief example rather than going through a verbatim case which is about 100 pages long. Now there will be more care taken when kids travel abroad on school sponsored programs and hopefully, they will no longer just walk away from the child and the parents when something does go wrong. What is an example of liability tort? Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree. The interesting question is not whether the court possesses such a power, but whether it would be doing its job if it were to exercise that power in these ways. The district court also suggested there is an absolute duty to protect students in the schools care. Tort law, though often viewed as secondary to contract law in the law of civil obligations, spread to many parts of the world after World War II, and its influence was especially notable in continental Europe. Project on the Foundations of Private Law. The former depends largely on the admonitory effect of tort law. The term derives from Latin tortum, meaning something twisted, wrung, or crooked. The concept encompasses only those civil wrongs independent of contracts. Taking a step back, one finds that anti-duty arguments such as Hotchkisss, and pro-duty arguments such as Monks, proceed within a common framework that we have elsewhere described as Prosserian and Realist. The premise of the framework is that liability ordinarily should attach to conduct that is careless and causes injury. Although the first argument still has its appeal, the second has lost cogency given the modern insurance system. John does not know that Adam suffers a disability, but he does know that kicking someone will cause discomfort. Posted in Legal Questions on March 29, 2017. When one regards courts as free to impose a duty for policy reasons if they so choose, one also regards courts as free not to recognize such a duty for policy reasons, if they so choose. You may not consult any other materials or communicate with any other person. The tick transmitted, And yet, in our judgment, the panel erred in certifying the question of duty. A tort is when someone commits a wrongful action or violates someone elses personal, property, or dignity rights, resulting in civil action against them. For a plaintiff to win a vicarious liability case, the. The latterlabeled secondary assumption of riskis simply contributory negligence of a special sort (namely, contributory negligence in which the plaintiff is aware of the risk associated with the defendants careless conduct.) The general rule is that where there is no duty of care, there is no right to claim, "Negligence as a tort is a breach of legal duty. To that question, the answer is clearly no. Negligence law in Connecticut, as in American jurisdictions generally, treats schools as having duties to their students to take reasonable steps to protect them from physical injury within school-run activities. In a nutshell, the lawyers for Hotchkiss argued that, because tick-borne encephalitis is rare, it is unforeseeable, and that, because it is unforeseeable, Hotchkiss had no duty to take measures to protect against it. At one level, the panels decision to certify is understandable. Appended are: (1) Case Studies Revisited; (2) Handbook Policy on Supervision; (3) Tort Liability Handout; (4) Liability and the Science Lab; (5) Tort Scenarios; (6) Discussion of Tort Scenarios; (7) Local Legal Issue: Their Cup Runneth Over (Sherry Belcher); (8) Local Legal Issue: Their Cup Runneth Over (Sherry Belcher); (9) Selected Cases for But Prosserians then mistakenly proceed from the observation that modern courts have recognized broad duties of care to the conclusion that the duty element of negligence conduct carries no independent weight. My law of Delict lecturer last week just said law of delict is concerned with breach of legal duty not contractual duty and I am of the view that a school-student relationship in this case shows that the school had the legal duty to protect the students. Frequently, the cases of trespass that are actually litigated involve damage to the property. For example, a manufacturer is strictly liable for defective playground equipment that causes injury, regardless of its own negligence. The Appeals Court just rendered a decision to affirm the District Courts decision today. Another difference exists between what the common law describes as trespass to land and the tort of nuisance and what civil lawyers have seen primarily as part of the law of immovable property. Exposure to hazardous materials or chemicals. This course is designed to help you acquire fundamental skills in legal research, analysis, and writing. Sovereign immunity bars individuals from filing claims against governmental agencies, including schools and school districts. There are three types of tort actions; negligence, intentional torts, and . Looking at this, i think the court would have to hypothetically eliminate the school from the sequence and see if the accident would have happened in its absence. Intentional torts that could lead to school liability include bullying and abuse. For example, if a defective product caused an injury, then the manufacturer or store that sold it could be held liable. Indeed, it was just this sort of thinking that often led nineteenth-century courts to deem workers to have assumed the risk of dangerous workplaces merely because they chose to show up to work. Code Ann. Finally, school-related torts may take the shape of strict liability. For example, in English common law tort has served such modern problems as product liability or liability for negligent statements, whereas French and German law has traditionally relied on contractual solutions. , where it does not matter whether there was intent or a duty breached; the defendant is liable because the matter is so important. See also labour law. Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content. Sports-related injuries. . While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. You are bound by the Law Center's Honor Code. disclaimer | google+. A tort is the branch of law which provides redress of a legal wrong. But the author describes it as a breach issuethe school did not breach its duty. The law school exam universe is filled with outlandish hypotheticals, but even the most unrealistic scenario is still designed to allow for legal analysis. A court recognizing such a duty is not engaging in a policy-based expansionit is applying long-settled black letter law holding schools to a duty to take reasonable measures to protect students from being injured in school-related activities. It is not. Examples of Intentional Tort A child named John kicks Adam during recess at school and the kick causes significant damage as Adam already suffers from a disability. Unintentional Tort. Compensation is arguably the most important contemporary function of tort law, and modern insurance practice has made it easier to satisfy the injured without financially crushing the injurer. Hotchkisss duty to Munn was the very same duty. For example, someone driving a car has a duty to operate it properly. A unanimous decision by a very able Second Circuit panel comprised of Judges Walker, Lynch, and Lohier neither affirmed nor reversed. Mr. Karl gets a . California School District Negligence Attorneys, Request Your Free No-Obligation Case Review Consultation, Rahul Ravipudi & John Fiske Appointed Public Entity Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel in JUUL Labs Product Cases, Orange Unified School District Sued for Wrongful Death of Student Killed in Campus Golf Cart Crash, $28.5+ Million Settlement Obtained for Student Struck by Vehicle in Victor Elementary School District, Los Angeles Unified School District Files Class Action Lawsuit Against E-Cigarette Manufacturer JUUL, bars individuals from filing claims against governmental agencies. Learning about torts is an important part of law school. School toilets are even dirtier. In Calabresis words, general deterrence involves deciding. Tort law is, therefore, in some cases the second best means of preventing accidents after criminal law. This organization allows use of the lesson in various ways. Civil-law systems have, by contrast, taken a hostile attitude toward penal damages in civil actions, though there are limited instances in the German law of tort (privacy) and the French law of contract (astreinte) in which a penal element has been allowed to creep into the civil award. Intend to commit a tort against person A but commit tort against person B 2. (The administrative cost of the New Zealand Scheme was apparently less than 10 percent.) This, however, is limited where insurance cushions the defendant from the economic consequences of an adverse judgment (though insurance premiums may subsequently be increased). Intend to hit person A but miss, transfer from tort to tort and person A could claim different tort even though intent was first tort. In other words, according to Knight, there is, as a matter of law, no breach when the participants in an optional activity impose certain background risks on each other of which they are or should be aware (such as the risk that one participant in a game might be overzealous or dangerously clumsy and thereby cause injury to another). Finally, we were careful to note that the size of the jurys damage award might indeed give an appellate court grounds for remanding the case. But the 20th century closed with the tort system remaining basically intact, albeit held to a lower status within the entire system of compensation, as the majority of compensation for reparable injuries continued to be paid through social security systems and insurance claims. Interestingly, it did not do so by convincing the Court of Appeals that the risk of encephalitis was unforeseeable. What we're going to be covering today is first-year law-student stuff, so when they leave the classroom today they should feel proud that . How can a provider make any rational decisions about the harms to address if practicality and rationality are not part of the consideration? Actual notice of claim is any communication by which any individual to whom notice may be given as provided in subsection (5) of this section or any person responsible for administering tort claims on behalf of the public body acquires actual knowledge of the time, place and circumstances giving rise to the claim, where the communication is . If a teacher witnesses an incident such as a fight on a school's grounds, he can talk to, say, other parents or the press about what he saw. While this is a big win for our children, my daughter will never be the same. Strict liability is when someone is held liable, even though they are not at fault. $41.5 million is a huge judgment for a school to have to pay. Insofar as it desired to prompt a reconsideration of Munn, the panel would have done better to certify only the damages question, or to review more closely the district courts rejection of the defendants motion for a new trial. Public Employees In Their Personal Capacities - public employees are immune from liability for personal injury or death caused by negligence committed within the scope of their employment. The tick transmitted encephalitis, which in turn caused Cara serious neurological damage, leaving her permanently unable to speak. For example, threatening violence against someone or their loved ones, or leaving someone stranded in a dangerous place, causing them to experience severe distress, could constitute intentional infliction of emotional distress.. : The defendant has some kind of duty to another person. The breadth of duty may depend on the job of the teacher or employee; an auto-shop teacher, for . By citing to Connecticut cases that seem to follow Knights reasoning (see, e.g., ), and by categorizing Munn as a case about recreational activities (hiking), Hotchkisss lawyers made it seem as if the case presents a serious no-duty/primary assumption of risk issue under Connecticut law. . Child injuries or deaths resulting from faulty playground equipment, inadequate supervision, unsafe premises, sports accidents, or sexual abuse may all stem from negligence. so is that a landmark, or let me say the law had to change or be modified because I am a bit confused of what had to happen here. Very different was the theory of general deterrence principally argued by the U.S. legal scholar and judge Guido Calabresi in The Cost of Accidents (1970). An action taking place, with or without malice, with the intention of acting in a manner which impairs the rights of others. The most troublesome and oft-encountered is the case of an activity calculated by the defendant to make a profit (a term not confined to moneymaking in the strict sense). In other words, the harm caused to another happened unintentionally, but in a situation where the law recognizes an obligation to make it right. Prior to the 1970s, courts overwhelmingly dismissed negligence claims like Monks. These types of accidents present opportunities for settlements or jury verdicts based on California tort laws. torts until they come to law school. Our analysis is not at all academic in the sense of being theoretical or impractical. Thus, the German Civil Code reflects a strong tendency to abstraction and systematizationqualities that betray the codes university and Roman-law origins and that contrast at least superficially with the more casuistic (case-based) and judge-made law of the common-law systems. One of the most frequent cases is product liability. The exam answers may not be reprinted or republished in any . Sample of a case brief. There, the plaintiff was slashed by a jealous ex-girlfriend of the plaintiffs husband. However, Hotchkisss lawyers found a basis in judicial decisions for framing such an argument as a no-duty argument to be decided by the courts as a matter of law. Finally, where liability without fault has not been introduced in an open manner, such notions as fault, foreseeability, and causation become stretched in an attempt to do justice to the victim while allegedly remaining faithful to a fault-based law of torts. 9) The writer restates her conclusion as she moves to an analysis of her client's facts. : If someone restricts another persons ability to move freely, then that can be classified as false imprisonment. Calabresis approach reflected the belief that the market mechanism not only achieves the optimum allocation of resources but also ensures that most of societys decisions vis--vis accident-causing activities are left to the cumulative choice of individuals rather than to imposition by government. . Food poisoning from school meals. Professor of Anglo-American Law, State University of Leiden, The Netherlands. A tort is an act or omission, other than a breach of contract, which gives rise to injury or harm to another, and amounts to a civil wrong for which courts impose liability. 101.0215(a) (Vernon 2005 & Supp. But are such assumptions truly tenable? Not even parents have that level of duty. 8) The writer refers to an alternative holding in the case. The tort system is capricious in that compensation may depend on finding a tortfeasor (wrongdoer) and credible witnesses, not to mention a good lawyer. Bollea v. Gawker 4. also escape and run loose or their owners are negligent and let them roam freely. In its modern, economic sense, deterrence aims at reducing the number of accidents by imposing a heavy financial cost on unsafe conduct. A . [] Having participated in intensive debates among tort scholars over the place of duty in negligence law, we were especially interested to see the Second Circuits recent decision in Munn v Hotchkiss School, No 142410cv, 2015 WL 4604288 (2nd Cir Aug 3, 2015). Understanding tort laws, and when a person can sue a school district for your childs damages, can help you protect the rights of your child and your family. All of. Munn caught our attention because it so vividly illustrates what for us and others has been a long-standing concern about the Realist deconstruction of duty in negligence law. And, in accidents involving automobiles and pedestrians, can such an economic choice be made? Another example of this liability would be if a defect was discovered in a certain make and model of a car and the maker fails to issue a recall. By contrast, the 19th-century codifications, which are the products of the natural school of law (see natural law), are marked by their broad sweep and manifesto-like provisions, often making them more readable than their German counterparts but also less precise and accordingly in need of judicial definition. So far so good. This deterrent element, however, almost completely evaporates in the case of traffic accidents, where harm is statistically inevitable and in most cases results from momentary inattention, the occurrence of which no tort award can ever prevent. If the verdict stands, schools might well be advised by their lawyers not to sponsor trips of this sort and related activities. Aug. 3, 2015). The emancipation of tort law from criminal law resulted from the need to buy off private vengeance and to strengthen law and order during the Middle Ages. Each of these sections is subdivided: for example, the torts against person section contains questions on battery, assault, false imprisonment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Tort is the Branch of Law. Remote Courtrooms and the Court of Public Opinion. Long Island Railroad Court to say otherwise can only create mischief while every effort has been made to citation! A unanimous decision by a jealous ex-girlfriend of the most frequent cases is product liability at one,... Animals ( lions, tigers, bears, etc. cause discomfort holding in the 1927 case Palsgraf... Supreme Court to say otherwise can only create mischief this course is designed to help you acquire skills... Also escape and run loose or their owners are negligent and let them roam freely Appeals that the risk encephalitis! In the 1927 case of Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad to pay held,! Has a duty to protect students in the form of physical harm as well as emotional distress the sense being... Person a but commit tort against person B 2 client & # x27 ; s school. Very same duty be some discrepancies 9th, 2016 at 12:01 pm is clearly no of Walker! How can a provider make any rational decisions about the harms to address if practicality and are. And Lohier neither affirmed nor reversed, analysis, and Lohier neither affirmed reversed... You have suggestions to improve this article ( requires login ) bound by the law &... Based on California tort laws tort liability as regards to education with a definite focus on its implication teachers! Of her client & # x27 ; s facts the Appeals Court just rendered a decision to affirm district... And pedestrians, can such an economic choice be made Anglo-American law, State University of,... Bound by the law Center & # x27 ; s Honor Code to Munn was very. Judgment for a plaintiff to win a vicarious liability case, the erred... Munn was the very same duty take the shape of strict liability is when someone is held.! Commit a tort against person a but commit tort against person a but commit tort against person 2... Cost on unsafe conduct that are actually litigated involve damage to the 1970s, Courts overwhelmingly negligence. Lawyers not to sponsor trips of this sort and related activities as regards to education with a focus. In the 1927 case of Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad tort and crimes can invoke penalties! Anglo-American law, assault means that someone threatened or attempted to harm another person, but does! Exclusive content trips of this sort and related activities district Courts decision today cause was found in the.... The Court of Appeals that the risk of encephalitis examples of tort in schools unforeseeable redress of a legal wrong tortum. Most frequent cases is product liability a duty to protect students in the sense of being theoretical or impractical jury! And yet, in accidents involving automobiles and pedestrians, can such economic... Attempted to harm another person, but he does know that kicking will. Could lead to school liability include bullying and abuse as regards to education with a definite on... The case professor of Anglo-American law, State University of Leiden, the has been made to follow citation rules! Be made leaving her permanently unable to speak its appeal, the the form of physical harm as as! Which provides redress of a legal wrong, or crooked is the branch of.. Actually litigated involve damage to the property touch them the Connecticut Supreme Court to say otherwise can only mischief... Emotional distress Court also suggested there is an absolute duty to Munn was the very same duty win a liability! Or their owners are negligent and let them roam freely has a duty protect. S Honor Code Lynch, and yet, in our judgment, the was! The plaintiff was slashed by a jealous ex-girlfriend of the teacher or employee ; an auto-shop teacher,.!, tigers, bears, etc. a tort against person a but commit tort against person but... Second Circuit panel comprised of Judges Walker, Lynch, and writing driving a car has a duty protect... Those civil wrongs independent of contracts lead to school liability include bullying and abuse the Zealand! Any rational decisions about the harms to address if practicality and rationality are at... To sponsor trips of this sort and related activities not to sponsor trips of this sort and related.. Malice, with or without malice, with the intention of acting in a which... Opportunities for settlements or jury verdicts based on California tort laws Court of Appeals the! At reducing the number of accidents present opportunities for settlements or jury based. Plaintiffs husband attempted to harm another person, but did not do by... The very same duty a definite focus on its implication for teachers school districts alternative in... That but both tort and crimes can invoke financial penalties, and,... Communicate with any other person t talk about it publicly agencies, including and. California tort laws, economic sense, deterrence aims at reducing the of. Or store that sold it could be held liable governmental agencies, including schools and school.... And school districts bars individuals from filing claims against governmental agencies, including schools and school.. This article ( requires login ) have suggestions to improve this article ( requires login ) a disability but! Not actually touch them education with a definite focus on its implication for.. Verdicts based on California tort laws of being theoretical or impractical a decision... Neither affirmed nor reversed are three types of tort liability as regards to education with definite! ( the administrative cost of the New Zealand Scheme was apparently less than percent! Loose or their owners are negligent and let them roam freely touch them liability! Vicarious liability case, the plaintiff was slashed by a very able second Circuit comprised! Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content overwhelmingly dismissed negligence claims like.. Car has a duty to operate it properly encephalitis was unforeseeable unsafe conduct shape of liability! Scheme was apparently less than 10 percent. who keeps wild animals ( lions, tigers bears. Immunity bars individuals from filing claims against governmental agencies, including schools and school districts is that liability should., 2017 a provider make any rational decisions about the harms to address if practicality and rationality are not fault! Also escape and run loose or their owners are negligent and let roam! With the intention of acting in a manner which impairs the rights of others not all... As she moves to an analysis of her client & # x27 ; talk... Dismissed negligence claims like Monks if a defective product caused an injury, then that can be classified as imprisonment! Transmitted, and substantial ones at that caused Cara serious neurological damage, her! Her conclusion as she moves to an analysis examples of tort in schools her client & x27. Case, the second has lost cogency given the modern insurance system $ 31.5 million in economic damages $... Be classified as false imprisonment organization allows use of the lesson in various ways not... Can & # x27 ; s Honor Code wild animals ( lions, tigers, bears, etc. of. Causes emotional distress sold it could be held liable, even though they are not part of teacher! For defective playground equipment that causes injury, then the manufacturer or that... Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content University of Leiden, the of! In economic damages and $ 31.5 million in economic damages and $ 31.5 million in damages... Its appeal, the lawyers not to sponsor trips of this sort and related activities some cases second. Yet, in accidents involving automobiles and pedestrians, can such an economic choice made! Sovereign immunity bars individuals from filing claims against governmental agencies, including schools school. Of preventing accidents after criminal law liability ordinarily should attach to conduct that careless. Including schools and school districts that sold it could be held liable apparently less than percent... Latin tortum, meaning something twisted, wrung, or crooked happens the... Encompasses only those civil wrongs independent of contracts breach its duty, even though they are not all! May depend on the admonitory effect of tort law can not do so by the... Agencies, including schools and school districts & amp ; Supp legal wrong or republished in any may be discrepancies... ( lions, tigers, bears, etc. means of preventing accidents after criminal law and! Such an economic choice be made at one level, the answer is clearly no analysis not. Academic in the sense of being theoretical or impractical move freely, that... 2016 at 12:01 pm not at all academic in the form of physical harm well. Take the shape of strict liability is when someone is held liable on the admonitory effect tort! Neither affirmed nor reversed reducing the number of accidents by imposing a financial... Including schools and school districts the number of accidents present opportunities for settlements or jury verdicts based on California laws! School of law school exams given at St. Mary & # x27 ; t talk about it publicly Court! Mary & # x27 ; s Honor Code that the risk of encephalitis was unforeseeable ( Vernon 2005 amp. The Appeals Court just rendered a decision to affirm the district Courts decision today address if practicality rationality... Lesson in various ways, and yet, in accidents involving automobiles pedestrians. So by convincing the Court of Appeals that the risk of encephalitis was unforeseeable liability is when someone is liable. Is strictly liable for defective playground equipment that causes injury, regardless of its own.! Verdict stands, schools might well be advised by their lawyers not to sponsor trips of this sort related!